Monday, 29 March 2010
Wrestlemania 26 opinions.
Last night saw Wrestlemania 26 an event which I claimed done right could dethrone the mighty Wrestlemania X-7 as the best 'Mania ever. Well lets just say that didn't happen.
The night kicked off with the Unified Tag Title match and it was good for what it was a short opener and I think the right thing was done keeping the belts on Showmiz, the Miz push continues which is a good thing.
Second up was the Legacy triple threat. The signs are not good for Cody he was lumbered with jobber level looking wrestling pants and boots and given his pre-legacy music back I suspect a elevated jobber role for him in a few months time. Randy Orton won the bout which in this writer's opinion was the wrong move. If Dibiase would have won that would have at least made him look competitive against Orton who for some reason has just been booked to bury his Legacy team mates for the past month. Orton won and made Rhodes and Dibiase look like they could be doomed to the mid card for a while yet.
Money In The Bank saw some interesting stunts but there never should have had as many people in the match as they did, but overall they did well, this was the only match of the night that even attempted to elevate young talent and that came in the form of Jack Swagger who won the match but if they would have continued his push from mid last year he could have been winning the championship tonight instead.
Triple H vs Sheamus saw quite a surprise actually it surpassed my expectations as they had a great match, Sheamus was made to look competitive against Triple H (even though on Raw he demolishes everyone) which should be classed as good enough for a night like this. A should make a note here the crowd had been into every match so far including this one.
Mysterio vs Punk was a good little match which lasted about 7 minutes which was unfair on these two as they could have stole the show with a 20 minute stunner but they did very well with the time allocated I can't wait to see what they offer in there inevitable rematch next month. Mysterio won which storyline wise I think was again a mistake as a JBL/Shawn style story could have given this storyline a nice touch.
As stated earlier the crown was really into the event at this point so when Bret vs Vince was shown as the next match people was really looking forward to the first of the big four matches. People could call this as an overstatement but I think this match could have single handedly killed Wrestlemania 26 from the stupid involvement of the Hart family to Harts crappy tire iron shots. The match was not believable and the crown went dead basically up until the sharpshooter when they livened up again. I think this match killed the crown for nearly the rest of the night, Jericho and Edge had to follow this up and had basically zero crowd support at the start which is a shame because the crowd can really make a difference when it comes to creating an exciting environment. Jericho retained in a decent match.
Cena vs Batista was a heavily hyped match and it did well, although not to the standards of there Summerslam scrap a few years back this was a worthy successor and did what needed to be done... giving Cena the title to set up his feuds with Batista, Triple H and Orton! YAY.
Shawn Michaels vs The Undertaker. The career vs the streak. This match was a classic, they went incredible fast and hard at the start and switched to a submission hold style for the middle and a lot of near falls near the end. The match was truly the best match of the night and proves WWE will struggle to replace these two when they are gone. The match was so good I don't think I could claim to have a favourite between this and there match at Wrestlemania 25. Michaels lost and so his career is "over" I think he will be back probably to wrestle 2 or 3 matches a year. Michaels has wanted a deal like that for some time and it seems he has it. The Undertaker has probably got to re think his career, he will never top his performance last night and with not many people left to face (Cena is about it) maybe he should just fight once or twice a year to get his streak up to 20 and then hang up his boots.
Wrestlemania then in my opinion was a let down, there should have been more young talent pushed and less of Bret Hart/McMahon at all. There should have been more time for some of the matches.. actually I think the event seemed kind of rushed as many of the participants only got to have their entrances down to about three quarters of the ramp. I never seen that at X-7 which had a longer entrance way. The night was not close to as bad as Wrestlemania 25 but I believe Michaels/Undertaker II saved the night again. McMahon has to pull his finger out and get building stars.
Friday, 26 March 2010
Wrestlemania - Personal Favourites.
Another memory of mine was Wrestlemania 14 when Austin won his first title against Michaels, that night you felt like the WWE was changing and for the next few years the Austin era reigned supreme.
Wrestlemania 16 saw possibly my favourite 'Mania moment when Triple H retained the title in the main event. At this time I was a real mark for Hunter and couldn't stand The Rock purely because of how popular he was. The amount of trash which was thrown into the ring at the end of the night just made my day. This Wrestlemania also blew my mind with the ladder match, but I must admit I still to this day prefer the No Mercy 1999 ladder match between the Hardys and Edge/Christian.
By Wrestlemania 17 I had improved my knowledge of the wrestling business and seen the Austin heel turn coming from a mile away,the fact I was right though still shocked me at the time. Also for some reason the gimmick battle royal still makes me smile seeing Doink the clown.
Other thing from the 'Manias post 17 which I thought were cool was the Lesnar/Angle match and the shooting star gone wrong. Undertakers return at Wrestlemania 20 and Edge's money in the bank win at Wrestlemania 21.
I was annoyed and and shocked when Cena made Hunter tap at Wrestlemania 22 I felt my younger mark getting very mardy when then happened. 24 saw the incredible Edge vs Taker match at Wrestlemania 24 and 25 saw well two words Michaels/Taker.
WrestleMania Classic Matches - My Top 26
Thursday, 25 March 2010
Wednesday, 24 March 2010
Triple H vs Sheamus - I Care Damn It
Tuesday, 23 March 2010
Promo Comparison.
Now compare this TNA, whose promo videos although adequate lack the dramatic nature of there WWE counterparts this could be blamed on the resources for the company. WWE's team have a wealth of experienced staff and can afford to plow much more money into there promos.
TNA however lack a team experience with Pro wrestling and could do with a sprucing up in there promos as nothing they air really gets me built up for a match quite like the WWE promos. I must state that some of the videos for TNA which look back at a PPV for three or so minutes to build up to the next segment are pretty impressive. These however are looking back at past events rather then promoting an upcoming event and are rarely seen by an audience inside the United States.
TNA Destinantion X results... well kind of.
Monday, 22 March 2010
Destination X Preview
Random Photo of the Day
Sunday, 21 March 2010
We Could be in For a Let down - WRESTLEMANIA 26
The card for this years Mania' is superb and in my opinion rivals the all-mighty WrestleMania X-7. You have got some of the most eagerly anticipated matches in Mania' history (HBK/Undertaker and McMahon/Hart), along with potential wrestling classics (Rey Mysterio/CM Punk and Edge/Chris Jericho) and the 'Mega-Match' between John Cena and Dave Batista for the WWE Championship. Also add in the Money in the Bank match, an exciting tag team match and two matches which could be minor show stealers (Orton/Dibease/Rhodes and HHH/Sheamus), this card cant go wrong......can it?
Three matches WILL determine how well this PPV will be remembered, and the event rests on their shoulders. If the following three matches produce then this event will go down as a classic, but for some reason, and I hope I am wrong, we could be in for a let down.
John Cena vs Dave Batista: Two men who have a history of putting on some bad matches are now in the ring together for what could be the Main Event. Yes Dave and John have both put on some great performances at past Mania's, and they also had a decent match at SummerSlam in 2008, but if earlier matches in the card produce then these men will have some pressure to deal with and if the fans get bored like they did at last years event, we could be in for a slow, uninspired match.
Bret Hart vs Vince McMahon: I am extremely worried about this match. With Bret Hart being out of action for 10 years and with all his past health problems, I cant see this match being that good, im hoping they make it short and use physical interactions to a minimum, and the time they do spend 'wrestling/fighting' each other make sure it looks real, even if they have to do it the hard way.
The Undertaker vs HBK: After last years stunning match I find it hard to believe they are going to top it. They need to bring something new to the table and for the life of me I do not have a clue what they can do. On saying this though, its Shawn Michaels and The Undertaker, if two men can do it, its these two.
Saturday, 20 March 2010
9 Man Money In The Bank
When looking at past ladder matches the better ones are where two men can really click and get things going. These matches usually have the same amount of slow burning as a regular match and have enough set peices that it can satisfy both the "stunt junkie" wrestling fans as well as the ones tuning in to see a great match. In recent memory I am refering to Michaels/Jericho and Undertaker/Edge.
The problem with nine men is that its way too overcrowded. In my opinion the eight man ladder matches are as well, it doesn't leave room for a story or a chance to elevate talent. Yes you get the winner and that its more about the story going on throughout the year and when the winner will cash in but with about two true candidates to win (Christian and McIntyre) is there really need for the other seven.
Also I do believe that they will add another man for the match to make it ten participants, the person will most likely be Kofi Kingston as he is not on the card and if Kingston is placed in the MITB then my guess is he'll be one of the favorites.
iMPACT ratings, Wrestlemania build up.
Shawn Michaels is currently telling his close friends and family that he will retire at Mania, my personal guess is that its all kayfabe. One popular idea would be for Triple H to screw Michael's out of the match. That would definatley freshen up The Game's gimmick.
Onto TNA and its recent ratings, I think its 0.8 rating against RAW on Monday was a good rating when you account for the variables, which are that TNA was a taped show so many people would just read the spoilers, that it was going up against Austin, Hart and McMahon and finally that this is the hottest time on the WWE calender "The Road to Wrestlemania". TNA's true test will be the period after Mania when they have had to establish there Monday time slot. Personally TNA should have gotten a time slot in which they start 1 hour prior to Raw.
Thats basically it for now, its now the Kane vs Angle match on the WM18 DVD why did they ever take Kane's mask off?